Hi Rafael etc. On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 22:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:Do you mean to say in the first sentence "...that _do_ need to implement..."? If not, then extended sounds like a misnomer and the two sentences seem to contradict one another. [...] Yeah, but right now, it seems to me to be a bogus limitation for drivers to have no way of automatically loading firmware when you're about to hibernate. (Of course I've since been reminded of the notifier chain - that should probably be mentioned here as the way of achieving this). By the way, I'm going to go on record now as saying I think dropping the freezer is a silly idea. I'm therefore currently considering including the freezer in TuxOnice from the time it gets dropped from mainline. I know that will only make it less likely that TuxOnIce gets merged, but I've given up caring about that anyway - caring about merging is pointless when the people who decide if it gets merged don't care. Regards, Nigel --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Justin Piszcz | exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 / SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
