OK, I'm not sure where we are with this.  Ben listed arches where
the generic pci_enable_resources() should be safe: x86, alpha, and
powerpc.  I think we should also include ia64, since I work on that.

If there's no objection to those arches, how should we move forward?
Since Andrew put in "revert gregkh-pci" patches rather than just
dropping things, I assume the original patches are in Greg KH's tree.

Can we just drop the "revert gregkh" patches for x86, alpha, powerpc,
and ia64?


--

[ message continues ]

So powerpc is OK but ppc might not be?

--

[ message continues ]

I suppose Ben is the expert on that, and he did say he thought both
powerpc and ppc would be OK.  I think we just care less about ppc
because powerpc is the new converged one.

Bjorn
--

[ message continues ]

No, ppc should be fine too.

Cheers,
Ben.

--

[ message continues ]

Considering that the generic is equivalent to what I have today on
powerpc, I'm fine with it.

Cheers,
Ben.


--

[ message continues ]

Ok, so what ones should I keep in my tree?

Bjorn, any help?

confused,

greg k-h
--

[ message continues ]

I think we should keep x86, alpha, powerpc, ppc, and ia64.

Kyle previously acked it for parisc, so maybe he can speak
up about whether to keep it there.

Bjorn
--

[ message continues ]

Ok, I've kept:
	x86
	alpha
	powerpc
	ppc
	parisc
	ia64

and dropped:
	arm
	cris
	frv
	mips
	mn10300
	sh
	sparc64
	v850
	xtensa

from my tree.

If anything further needs to be changed, please let me know.

thanks,

greg k-h
--

[ message continues ]