login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
1
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Andi Kleen <andi@...>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <penberg@...>, Jörn Engel <joern@...>, <ext-adrian.hunter@...>, <jwboyer@...>
Subject:
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)
Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2008 - 7:06 am
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@yandex.ru> writes:
quoted text
> Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > > For me, the motivators to wait for LogFS are mainly the facts that it > > can work on traditional block devices, and not only on pure flash: > > Sorry Thomasz, for me this makes zero sense. There are _much_ better file > systems for block devices.
I think he refers to flash disks appearing as block devices, like usb sticks or similar. -Andi --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)
, Tomasz Chmielewski
, (Tue Apr 1, 4:02 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Artem Bityutskiy
, (Tue Apr 1, 4:45 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Andi Kleen
, (Tue Apr 1, 7:06 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Artem Bityutskiy
, (Tue Apr 1, 7:23 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Apr 1, 12:27 pm)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Willy Tarreau
, (Tue Apr 1, 5:26 pm)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Artem Bityutskiy
, (Wed Apr 2, 12:47 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Willy Tarreau
, (Wed Apr 2, 2:25 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Artem Bityutskiy
, (Wed Apr 2, 3:17 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Tomasz Chmielewski
, (Tue Apr 1, 5:39 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Artem Bityutskiy
, (Tue Apr 1, 5:57 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Tomasz Chmielewski
, (Wed Apr 2, 10:17 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Jörn
, (Wed Apr 2, 10:22 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Jörn
, (Tue Apr 1, 5:03 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Artem Bityutskiy
, (Tue Apr 1, 5:09 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Jörn
, (Tue Apr 1, 5:31 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Pavel Machek
, (Wed Apr 9, 5:09 pm)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s...
, Jörn
, (Wed Apr 9, 5:32 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Paul Jackson
Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets
James Bottomley
Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))
David Miller
Slow DOWN, please!!!
Masami Hiramatsu
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Parag Warudkar
Re: 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
5 users
and
1049 guests
online.
Online users
zeekec
homealarm01
carportgcqq
avondwerkqhgpkz
rockytherobott
Syndicate