On Tue, 1 April 2008 12:39:25 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:Fair enough. The obvious downside of all this is depending on UBI, which has a linear scan. My goal was to avoid the linear scan completely. It is a harder goal and I haven't reached it yet. Imo it is reachable and I will continue going in that direction. You picked the route of using UBI, which makes a lot of stuff easier. It is a fair approach and I don't mind you taking it. It has drawbacks, but so has everything else. Jörn -- Anything that can go wrong, will. -- Finagle's Law --
| Ingo Molnar | [bug] mm/slab.c boot crash in -git, "kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2103!" |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Petr Baudis | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Johannes Schindelin | Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept |
| Wincent Colaiuta | Re: git push (mis ?)behavior |
| Dan McGee | Re: I don't want the .git directory next to my code. |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| David Newman | setting dscp or tos bits |
| Karel Kulhavy | lookup option in /etc/resolv.conf ignored |
| Frans Haarman | Compaq 6710b |
| BILES, GREG THOMAS | mtools |
| Lars Wirzenius | Re: Splitting comp.os.linux |
| Paul Monday - CS | Re: Things to write (was Re: How can I get a piece of the action?!) |
| Robert L. Mcmillin | Re: Splitting comp.os.lin |
