login
Header Space

 
 

Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <penberg@...>, <ext-adrian.hunter@...>, <jwboyer@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2008 - 5:31 am

On Tue, 1 April 2008 12:09:35 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:

When the day comes and I can actually use raw flash with a SATA or USB
transport medium, I will be more careful and not imply that they all
expose a block device interface.  Today they do.

[ With the exception of Alauda, which has a userbase of about 1 - me. ]

Jörn

-- 
It does not matter how slowly you go, so long as you do not stop.
-- Confucius
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system), Tomasz Chmielewski, (Tue Apr 1, 4:02 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s..., Tomasz Chmielewski, (Tue Apr 1, 5:39 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s..., Tomasz Chmielewski, (Wed Apr 2, 10:17 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s..., Jörn, (Tue Apr 1, 5:31 am)
speck-geostationary