Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jörn
Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2008 - 2:31 am

On Tue, 1 April 2008 12:09:35 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:

When the day comes and I can actually use raw flash with a SATA or USB
transport medium, I will be more careful and not imply that they all
expose a block device interface.  Today they do.

[ With the exception of Alauda, which has a userbase of about 1 - me. ]

Jörn

-- 
It does not matter how slowly you go, so long as you do not stop.
-- Confucius
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system), Tomasz Chmielewski, (Tue Apr 1, 1:02 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file ..., Jörn, (Tue Apr 1, 2:31 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file ..., Tomasz Chmielewski, (Tue Apr 1, 2:39 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file ..., Tomasz Chmielewski, (Wed Apr 2, 7:17 am)