login
Header Space

 
 

Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <penberg@...>, <ext-adrian.hunter@...>, <jwboyer@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2008 - 5:09 am

Jörn Engel wrote:

Well, Thomasz was talking not about the transport I believe. If you have a
raw flash access via SATA or USB, then this is handled on the driver level
and does not any require FS support. JFFS2 or UBIFS may also work with such a
device, because it is just raw flash. But I know that you know that most of
the FTL-enabled stuff does not give use raw flash access.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system), Tomasz Chmielewski, (Tue Apr 1, 4:02 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s..., Tomasz Chmielewski, (Tue Apr 1, 5:39 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s..., Tomasz Chmielewski, (Wed Apr 2, 10:17 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s..., Artem Bityutskiy, (Tue Apr 1, 5:09 am)
speck-geostationary