login
Header Space

 
 

Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <penberg@...>, <ext-adrian.hunter@...>, <jwboyer@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2008 - 5:03 am

On Tue, 1 April 2008 11:45:56 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:

About a year ago I would have used roughly the same argument.  But in
the meanwhile I have accepted the fact that any piece of flash I'll use
in a notebook in the next five years will likely use SATA or USB as a
transport medium.

Jörn

-- 
...one more straw can't possibly matter...
-- Kirby Bakken
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system), Tomasz Chmielewski, (Tue Apr 1, 4:02 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s..., Tomasz Chmielewski, (Tue Apr 1, 5:39 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s..., Tomasz Chmielewski, (Wed Apr 2, 10:17 am)
Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file s..., Jörn, (Tue Apr 1, 5:03 am)
speck-geostationary