I've renamed the thread because I do not like this flamish discussion to me mixed with the technical one. Jörn Engel wrote:We'll re-run them. Does logfs support write-back? Does it support compression? Is this patch the right one we should look at: This basically means it is unfinished. Handling dynamic bad blocks is a *must* if you are going to work on NAND, especially on MLC NAND which are not as reliable as SLC. I think you should bluntly say about this when you submit patches to prevent people from starting using it in production. UBI handles I/O errors and gracefully recovers the data. And it will not be easy to do this in LogFS at all. If you have write error in the middle of an eraseblock, you have to recover data which means correcting all the indexing data structures which refer the data you recover. Correcting them may require garbage collection, because you have to update them out of place. And what do you do if you are already in the middle of doing garbage-collection? In other words, I believe it will take a lot of time and efforts to implement this. And any speculation about the number of lines of code makes no sense before you finish your work. Could you please point the core functions which implement this and shortly describe the algorithm? I grep'ed for "wear" and "leveling" and found only one match. Where should I look at? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) --
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| David Newall | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Greg KH | Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
| James Morris | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
