Re: [PATCH] x86: Change x86 to use generic find_next_bit

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alexander van Heukelum
Date: Sunday, March 9, 2008 - 1:31 pm

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:11:52 +0100, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu> said:

Worse, it's needed to get x86_64 to compile.

They are defined in include/asm-x86/bitops_64.h (which gets
included). They are used to optimize the case where the
bitmap size is known at compile time and not larger than
BITS_PER_LONG. Undeffing them here is the easiest way to get
things to compile, here.

Greetings,
    Alexander

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: Change x86 to use generic find_next_bit, Alexander van Heukelum, (Sun Mar 9, 1:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Change x86 to use generic find_next_bit, Alexander van Heukelum, (Sun Mar 9, 1:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Change x86 to use generic find_next_bit, Alexander van Heukelum, (Sun Mar 9, 2:13 pm)
[RFC/PATCH] x86: Optimize find_next_(zero_)bit for small c ..., Alexander van Heukelum, (Mon Mar 10, 4:17 pm)
[PATCH] x86: Optimize find_next_(zero_)bit for small const ..., Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Mar 11, 8:17 am)
[RFC] non-x86: Optimize find_next_(zero_)bit for small con ..., Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Mar 11, 8:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Change x86 to use generic find_next_bit, Aneesh Kumar K.V, (Thu Mar 13, 5:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Change x86 to use generic find_next_bit, Alexander van Heukelum, (Thu Mar 13, 7:27 am)