FUJITA Tomonori wrote:Well, this makes little sense, right? I mean, if just a normal filesystem I/O produces more I/O requests than the machine can handle, - it means the kernel is broken. It shouldn't let the queue to grow without bounds. The hardware is quite capable - 14-drives raid10 array works pretty fast, that is. which should be quite huge leakage, as it happens almost immediately, on a freshly booted system. Just tried this option. Gzip is working for 15 minutes already, -- previously the system hanged within a first minute, usually first 10 secs. It seems it will survive the test. It's difficult to say if it was ok with older kernels. I'll try anyway. The thing is that this very workload is new for this machine. Once upon a time it hanged in a very similar way, but we had no time to debug the issue and just ignored it, in a hope for the best. By the way, is there something to look at, for swiommu space leaks -- like slabinfo for example...? Thanks! /mjt --
| Ian Campbell | Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format. |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Justin Piszcz | Linux Software RAID 5 Performance Optimizations: 2.6.19.1: (211MB/s read & 195... |
| Alan | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Matthias Scheler | Re: HEADS UP: timecounters (branch simonb-timecounters) merged into -current |
| David Laight | long usernames |
| Quentin Garnier | Re: Understanding foo_open, foo_read, etc. |
| Jared D. McNeill | Breaking binary compatibility for /dev/joy |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
