On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> wrote:
quoted text
> Hi Dave, Andrew and all
>
>
>  Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> writes:
>
>  > +/* time_now_after(a) return true if now (jiffies) is after a */
>  > +#define time_now_after(a) time_after(jiffies, a)
>  > +
>  > +/* time_now_before(a) return true if now (jiffies) is before a */
>  > +#define time_now_before(a) time_before(jiffies, a)
>  > +
>  > +/* time_now_after_eq(a) return true if now (jiffies) is after or equal to a */
>  > +#define time_now_after_eq(a) time_after_eq(jiffies, a)
>  > +
>  > +/* time_now_before_eq(a) return true if now (jiffies) is before or equal to a */
>  > +#define time_now_before_eq(a) time_before_eq(jiffies, a)
>
>  How about even more obvious names like time_is_past(), time_is_future(),
>  ...?

Thanks for comment.

Then how do we name the _eq version?  IMHO, the time_now_* is enough.

quoted text
>
>  Sorry, I missed v1.  Should have proposed that earlier.
>
>         Hannes
>

Regards
dave
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/