Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Brownell <david-b@...>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Saturday, March 8, 2008 - 5:13 pm

On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 17:13 -0800, David Brownell wrote:

I originally had milli but changed to micro to conform with
power_supply.h (as our PMIC uses this interface to export it input
supplies to userspace).


In general it's up to the system hardware designer to ensure each
regulator can supply all the consumers on the domain - hence we don't
have power budgeting in software atm. However, I don't think it would be
too difficult to add in the future.

I'll also add support for a regulator that will do both voltage and
current (although I'm not aware of any in the market atm).


Agreed.


Ok, total_ sounds good.

Liam

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI, Liam Girdwood, (Thu Mar 6, 2:12 pm)
Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI, David Brownell, (Fri Mar 7, 9:13 pm)
Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI, Liam Girdwood, (Sat Mar 8, 5:13 pm)
Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI, Greg KH, (Fri Mar 7, 12:12 pm)
Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI, Mark Brown, (Fri Mar 7, 5:17 pm)
Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI, David Brownell, (Fri Mar 7, 9:17 pm)
Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI, Liam Girdwood, (Sat Mar 8, 1:26 pm)