The revocation table initialisation/destruction code is repeated for each of
the two revocation tables stored in the journal. Refactoring the duplicated
code into functions is tidier, simplifies the logic in initialisation in
particular, and slightly reduces the code size.
There should not be any functional change.
Signed-off-by: Duane Griffin <duaneg@dghda.com>
---
fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
index df36f42..07e4703 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
@@ -196,109 +196,84 @@ void jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke_caches(void)
jbd2_revoke_table_cache = NULL;
}
-/* Initialise the revoke table for a given journal to a given size. */
-
-int jbd2_journal_init_revoke(journal_t *journal, int hash_size)
+static struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *jbd2_journal_init_revoke_table(int hash_size)
{
- int shift, tmp;
+ int shift = 0;
+ int tmp = hash_size;
+ struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *table;
- J_ASSERT (journal->j_revoke_table[0] == NULL);
+ table = kmem_cache_alloc(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!table)
+ goto out;
- shift = 0;
- tmp = hash_size;
while((tmp >>= 1UL) != 0UL)
shift++;
- journal->j_revoke_table[0] = kmem_cache_alloc(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!journal->j_revoke_table[0])
- return -ENOMEM;
- journal->j_revoke = journal->j_revoke_table[0];
-
- /* Check that the hash_size is a power of two */
- J_ASSERT(is_power_of_2(hash_size));
-
- journal->j_revoke->hash_size = hash_size;
-
- journal->j_revoke->hash_shift = shift;
-
- journal->j_revoke->hash_table =
+ table->hash_size = hash_size;
+ table->hash_shift = shift;
+ table->hash_table =
kmalloc(hash_size * sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!journal->j_revoke->hash_table) {
- kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, journal->j_revoke_table[0]);
- journal->j_revoke = NULL;
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!table->hash_table) {
+ kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, table);
+ table = NULL;
+ goto out;
}
for (tmp = 0; tmp < hash_size; tmp++)
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&journal->j_revoke->hash_table[tmp]);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&table->hash_table[tmp]);
- journal->j_revoke_table[1] = kmem_cache_alloc(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!journal->j_revoke_table[1]) {
- kfree(journal->j_revoke_table[0]->hash_table);
- kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, journal->j_revoke_table[0]);
- return -ENOMEM;
+out:
+ return table;
+}
+
+static void jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke_table(struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *table)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct list_head *hash_list;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < table->hash_size; i++) {
+ hash_list = &table->hash_table[i];
+ J_ASSERT(list_empty(hash_list));
}
- journal->j_revoke = journal->j_revoke_table[1];
+ kfree(table->hash_table);
+ kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, table);
+}
- /* Check that the hash_size is a power of two */
+/* Initialise the revoke table for a given journal to a given size. */
+int jbd2_journal_init_revoke(journal_t *journal, int hash_size)
+{
+ J_ASSERT(journal->j_revoke_table[0] == NULL);
J_ASSERT(is_power_of_2(hash_size));
- journal->j_revoke->hash_size = hash_size;
+ journal->j_revoke_table[0] = jbd2_journal_init_revoke_table(hash_size);
+ if (!journal->j_revoke_table[0])
+ goto fail0;
- journal->j_revoke->hash_shift = shift;
+ journal->j_revoke_table[1] = jbd2_journal_init_revoke_table(hash_size);
+ if (!journal->j_revoke_table[1])
+ goto fail1;
- journal->j_revoke->hash_table =
- kmalloc(hash_size * sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!journal->j_revoke->hash_table) {
- kfree(journal->j_revoke_table[0]->hash_table);
- kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, journal->j_revoke_table[0]);
- kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, journal->j_revoke_table[1]);
- journal->j_revoke = NULL;
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
- for (tmp = 0; tmp < hash_size; tmp++)
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&journal->j_revoke->hash_table[tmp]);
+ journal->j_revoke = journal->j_revoke_table[1];
spin_lock_init(&journal->j_revoke_lock);
return 0;
-}
-/* Destoy a journal's revoke table. The table must already be empty! */
+fail1:
+ jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke_table(journal->j_revoke_table[0]);
+fail0:
+ return -ENOMEM;
+}
+/* Destroy a journal's revoke table. The table must already be empty! */
void jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke(journal_t *journal)
{
- struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *table;
- struct list_head *hash_list;
- int i;
-
- table = journal->j_revoke_table[0];
- if (!table)
- return;
-
- for (i=0; i<table->hash_size; i++) {
- hash_list = &table->hash_table[i];
- J_ASSERT (list_empty(hash_list));
- }
-
- kfree(table->hash_table);
- kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, table);
- journal->j_revoke = NULL;
-
- table = journal->j_revoke_table[1];
- if (!table)
- return;
-
- for (i=0; i<table->hash_size; i++) {
- hash_list = &table->hash_table[i];
- J_ASSERT (list_empty(hash_list));
- }
-
- kfree(table->hash_table);
- kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, table);
journal->j_revoke = NULL;
+ if (journal->j_revoke_table[0])
+ jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke_table(journal->j_revoke_table[0]);
+ if (journal->j_revoke_table[1])
+ jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke_table(journal->j_revoke_table[1]);
}
--
1.5.3.7
--
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Tim Tassonis | reiser4 for 2.6.27-rc1 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default |
git: | |
| Alex Riesen | Re: question about git-submodule |
| Greg KH | Re: [ANNOUNCE] pg - A patch porcelain for GIT |
| Nicolas Pitre | Re: git-index-pack really does suck.. |
| Bill Lear | Meaning of "fatal: protocol error: bad line length character"? |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Matt | Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences? |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| bsd_news | LC_COLLATE and PostgreSQL |
| Eric Sandeen | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| John Stoffel | Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three |
| Al Boldi | Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck |
| Alex Zarochentsev | Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 |
