David R wrote:I didn't see any problem offhand with the other patches 0 to 3 in this set, but this patch 4/4 surprises me. Perhaps I'm out of phase with what's customary in the kernel, but I prefer directly including whatever headers I explicitly need. Depending on some other header to drag in something you have explicit need of anyway makes things more fragile. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214 --
| Con Kolivas | Re: [ANNOUNCE] RSDL completely fair starvation free interactive cpu scheduler |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Steven Rostedt | Major regression on hackbench with SLUB |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Junio C Hamano | [0/4] What's not in 1.5.2 (overview) |
| Jan Hudec | Smart fetch via HTTP? |
| Peter Oberndorfer | Re: [StGIT PATCH] Don't use patches/<branch>/current |
| Nicolas Pitre | Re: git-index-pack really does suck.. |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Reyk Floeter | Re: hoststated(8): DNS Relay uses unexpected source IP address |
| Mark Zimmerman | Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)? |
| Anselm R. Garbe | OpenBSD 4.0 / Xorg -> vesa 1920x1200 widescreen resolution |
| hh | Hardware compatibility list |
| Doug Evans | Re: Stabilizing Linux |
| Linus Benedict Torvalds | More answers |
| Dave `geek' Gymer | WARNING (was Re: New afio release) |
