Re: [PATCH] x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Thursday, March 6, 2008 - 9:21 am

> you probably want a BUG_ON instead (or some graceful recovery) else

FWIW oopses don't have any trouble with interrupts being off.
So BUG_ON wouldn't add much value.

-Andi

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Mar 6, 6:48 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Mar 6, 7:18 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives, Andi Kleen, (Thu Mar 6, 9:21 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Mar 6, 10:25 am)