Re: [PATCH] x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Cc: Srinivasa DS <srinivasa@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <ananth@...>, Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...>, <srikar@...>, SystemTAP <systemtap@...>, Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
Date: Thursday, March 6, 2008 - 9:59 am

On 6 Mar 2008 at 15:01, Ingo Molnar wrote:


you probably want a BUG_ON instead (or some graceful recovery) else
the NULL deref will trigger with IRQs off...



--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Mar 6, 9:48 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives, , (Thu Mar 6, 9:59 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Mar 6, 1:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Mar 6, 10:18 am)