On Tue 2008-03-04 09:55:28, Suresh Siddha wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 11:32:20AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:20:12PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:02:46PM -0800, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > > > > +	/*
> > > > > +	 * Memory allocation at the first usage of the FPU and other state.
> > > > > +	 */
> > > > > +	if (!tsk->thread.xstate)
> > > > > +		tsk->thread.xstate = kmem_cache_alloc(task_xstate_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > >
> > > >  Also don't we need some kind of error handling here?
> > > 
> > > Currently it uses SLAB_PANIC.
> > 
> > but SLAB_PANIC only covers kmem_cache_create() failures. 
> > 
> > kmem_cache_alloc() can fail (return NULL) and not handling it is a bug.
> 
> oops. you are correct. Will send a sigsegv in the failure case then. Thanks.

You are introducing possibility of hard to debug error, where previous
code just worked... Does not look like good idea to me.
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/