Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Michael Matz
Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2008 - 3:51 pm

Hi,

On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, David Miller wrote:


Give them a LD_PRELOADable DSO that intercepts signal() and sig_action(), 
installing a trampoline that first does "cld" and then jumps to the real 
handler.  That ought to be a quick test if it's this or a different issue.  
A hack, yes, but well... :)


Many bugs are a big issue to people who actually hit them, and we had (and 
probably still have) far nastier corner case miscompilations here and 
there and nevertheless released.  It never was the end of the world :)

Let it be a data point that nobody noticed the problem which existed in 
trunk since more than a year (since 2006-12-06 to be precise).


Ciao,
Michael.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag, Aurelien Jarno, (Wed Mar 5, 8:30 am)
[PATCH] x86: Clear DF before calling signal handler, Aurelien Jarno, (Wed Mar 5, 11:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Clear DF before calling signal handler, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Mar 5, 11:17 am)
Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI w ..., Michael Matz, (Wed Mar 5, 3:51 pm)
Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag, Mikael Pettersson, (Thu Mar 6, 2:45 am)
Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag, Richard Guenther, (Thu Mar 6, 5:06 am)
Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag, Richard Guenther, (Thu Mar 6, 1:54 pm)