Re: E1000: e1000_update_stats()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Kok, Auke
Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2008 - 2:34 pm

[ Adding netdev@vger.kernel.org !]

Todd Tomaino wrote:

not per se, I think you did the right thing here. I think it might even be safe to
move the PHY reads outside the spinlock area, and this is certainly something I
would like to try.

would you care to send an RFC patch to netdev@vger.kernel.org?

Also, I notice you are using an old driver/kernel. care to retest against the
latest git trees?

I'll certainly take your suggestion and have it tested.

Auke
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
E1000: e1000_update_stats(), Todd Tomaino, (Wed Mar 5, 1:45 pm)
Re: E1000: e1000_update_stats(), Chris Friesen, (Wed Mar 5, 2:22 pm)
Re: E1000: e1000_update_stats(), Kok, Auke, (Wed Mar 5, 2:34 pm)
Re: E1000: e1000_update_stats(), Kok, Auke, (Wed Mar 5, 2:40 pm)
Re: E1000: e1000_update_stats(), Chris Friesen, (Wed Mar 5, 3:00 pm)