* Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote:

quoted text
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > > Ingo, i's simply not possible to put ndiswrapper in user-space sanely.
> > > Drivers are drivers. They'll want (shared) interrupts, they want DMA, 
> > > they want to do things like cli/sti.
> > yeah, i agree that putting it into userspace is quite insane.
> > it might possible to do it halfways sanely via existing arch/x86/kvm/ 
> > infrastructure though. VMX/SVM context will properly emulate the IRQ 
> > flag so cli/sti will work fine, and as long as DMA is properly 
> > quarantined via an iommu it might even not corrupt the rest of the 
> > system. 
> 
> This definitely could be a [hackish] way to go. The remarkable 
> drawback is that it will not work on CPUs without virtualization 
> extensions.

by the time it's implemented and trickles into distributions the 
majority of PCs will have virtualization extensions.

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/