Re: 2.6.25 possible regression usbfs options ignored?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Greg KH
Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2008 - 5:03 pm

On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:54:56PM +0100, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:

Wait, look in the directory for the devices, that is what you are
setting the option for:
	$ ls -l /proc/bus/usb/001/
	total 0
	-rw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 43 Mar  4 13:29 001
	-rw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 59 Mar  4 13:29 004
	-rw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 52 Mar  4 13:29 007
	$ mount | grep usb
	usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,devmode=0664,devgid=85)

So I think everything is just fine, right?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.25 possible regression usbfs options ignored?, Lukas Hejtmanek, (Mon Mar 3, 2:54 pm)
Re: 2.6.25 possible regression usbfs options ignored?, Greg KH, (Tue Mar 4, 5:03 pm)
Re: 2.6.25 possible regression usbfs options ignored?, Lukas Hejtmanek, (Wed Mar 5, 4:22 pm)