> I'm glad someone who actually understands signal code got to look at
quoted text
> this ;-). The patch looks okay to me, but I can't say I'm too
> qualified in this area.
> 
> ...but this is 2.6.26 material, right?

Yes, I think that's fine.  

I tested this only to the extend of doing some pm-suspend + resume
iterations with a stopped job and seeing that job behave correctly
before and after (and no spurious re-stop).


Thanks,
Roland
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/