Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » March » 4

Re: [PATCH] x86: a P4 is a P6 not an i486

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: a P4 is a P6 not an i486
Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2008 - 5:01 pm

* Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote:


thanks Hugh, applied.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: a P4 is a P6 not an i486, Hugh Dickins, (Tue Mar 4, 3:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: a P4 is a P6 not an i486, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 4, 5:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: a P4 is a P6 not an i486, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Mar 4, 5:24 pm)
P6 NOPs again: MPSC?, Hugh Dickins, (Mon Mar 10, 3:14 pm)
Re: P6 NOPs again: MPSC?, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Mar 10, 4:17 pm)
Re: P6 NOPs again: MPSC?, Hugh Dickins, (Mon Mar 10, 6:02 pm)
Re: P6 NOPs again: MPSC?, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 11, 5:28 am)
Re: P6 NOPs again: MPSC?, Hugh Dickins, (Tue Mar 11, 9:45 am)
Re: P6 NOPs again: MPSC?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Mar 11, 2:43 am)
Re: P6 NOPs again: MPSC?, Hugh Dickins, (Tue Mar 11, 10:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: a P4 is a P6 not an i486, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 4, 5:32 pm)