On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, David Brownell wrote:

quoted text
> > I don't understand this comment.  Suppose a card was inserted while the 
> > system was hibernating.  If the core didn't reprobe, when would that 
> > card be discovered?
> 
> The host controller would tell the core to check for a card, exactly
> like it does at all other times.

But how would the host controller know to do that?  Isn't card 
insertion detection often driven by interrupts?  If a card is 
inserted while the computer is off, no interrupt will be generated.

quoted text
> That's the natural alternative to having the MMC core assume that card
> detection was broken in low power states, so that the core needed to
> forcibly remove the cards before suspend, and reprobe during resume
> processing.

Is that the assumption the MMC core was really making?  Are you sure it 
wasn't assuming something else (perhaps equally as bad)?

quoted text
> Having the MMC core make such needless assumptions can cause problems
> for the upper layers, including filesystems.

What's wrong with a superfluous probe at resume time, besides the waste 
of a few milliseconds?

Alan Stern

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/