Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...>, <htejun@...>, <tomof@...>, <James.Bottomley@...>, <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-ide@...>, <linux-scsi@...>, <jgarzik@...>, <bzolnier@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2008 - 8:37 am

On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 10:35 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:


K3b burning seems to be a nogo here.  This is git pulled this morning
though, so it's a somewhat different tree than previously tested fwtw.

[  136.440021] ata1.01: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
[  136.440043] ata1.01: cmd a0/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/b0 tag 0
[  136.440045]          cdb 51 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[  136.440047]          res 58/00:02:00:02:00/00:00:00:00:00/b0 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
[  136.440053] ata1.01: status: { DRDY DRQ }
[  136.440086] ata1: soft resetting link
[  165.327627] ata1.01: qc timeout (cmd 0xa1)
[  165.327627] ata1.01: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)
[  165.327627] ata1.01: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
[  165.327627] ata1: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs
[  177.272373] ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient (Status 0x80)
[  180.388879] ata1: device not ready (errno=-16), forcing hardreset
[  180.388879] ata1: soft resetting link
[  210.832471] ata1.01: qc timeout (cmd 0xa1)
[  210.832471] ata1.01: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)
[  210.832471] ata1.01: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
[  210.832471] ata1: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs
[  223.392899] ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient (Status 0x80)
[  225.920376] ata1: device not ready (errno=-16), forcing hardreset
[  225.920376] ata1: soft resetting link
[  256.542565] ata1.01: qc timeout (cmd 0xa1)
[  256.542565] ata1.01: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)
[  256.542565] ata1.01: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
[  256.542565] ata1.01: disabled
[  259.995199] ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x40)
[  259.995214] ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
[  259.995219] ata1: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs
[  265.047502] ata1: soft resetting link
[  262.397570] ata1.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable
[  262.420039] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
[  262.420039] sr 0:0:1:0: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE,SUGGEST_OK
[  262.420039] sr 0:0:1:0: [sr0] Sense Key : Aborted Command [current] [descriptor]
[  262.420039] Descriptor sense data with sense descriptors (in hex):
[  262.420039]         72 0b 47 00 00 00 00 0e 09 0c 00 00 00 02 00 00 
[  262.420039]         00 02 00 00 b0 58 
[  262.420039] sr 0:0:1:0: [sr0] Add. Sense: Scsi parity error
[  262.420039] ata1: EH complete
[  262.420257] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 312581808 512-byte hardware sectors (160042 MB)
[  262.420320] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[  262.420326] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
[  262.420390] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA



--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Mike Galbraith, (Thu Feb 21, 4:42 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Jens Axboe, (Fri Feb 22, 3:32 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Feb 23, 3:42 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Feb 24, 3:54 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Feb 26, 5:48 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Feb 26, 9:36 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Andrew Morton, (Tue Feb 26, 7:08 pm)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Feb 26, 8:46 pm)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Feb 26, 10:58 pm)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Feb 26, 10:24 pm)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Mike Galbraith, (Wed Feb 27, 2:00 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Mike Galbraith, (Wed Feb 27, 3:07 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Tejun Heo, (Thu Feb 28, 3:43 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke, Mike Galbraith, (Thu Feb 28, 4:20 am)
[PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Tejun Heo, (Thu Feb 28, 4:50 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Thu Feb 28, 11:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Tejun Heo, (Thu Feb 28, 11:46 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, James Bottomley, (Fri Feb 29, 12:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Fri Feb 29, 4:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Sun Mar 2, 10:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Tejun Heo, (Sun Mar 2, 10:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Sun Mar 2, 11:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Tejun Heo, (Mon Mar 3, 12:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: separate out padding from alignment, James Bottomley, (Mon Mar 3, 2:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Mon Mar 3, 4:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Mon Mar 3, 8:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Mon Mar 3, 9:50 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Mon Mar 3, 10:01 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Tejun Heo, (Mon Mar 3, 10:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Mon Mar 3, 10:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Mon Mar 3, 10:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Tejun Heo, (Mon Mar 3, 10:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Mar 4, 4:53 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 4:59 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Mar 4, 5:06 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Mar 4, 5:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 5:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 5:46 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Mar 4, 8:37 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Mar 4, 9:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Tejun Heo, (Tue Mar 4, 12:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Tejun Heo, (Tue Mar 4, 12:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Boaz Harrosh, (Tue Mar 4, 2:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Mar 4, 3:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Mar 4, 8:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, FUJITA Tomonori, (Thu Mar 6, 12:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Mar 4, 2:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 3:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Mar 4, 3:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 3:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, James Bottomley, (Tue Mar 4, 2:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Mar 4, 8:45 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 8:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Tue Mar 4, 3:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, James Bottomley, (Tue Mar 4, 12:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 2:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Mar 4, 8:43 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Mar 4, 8:58 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 9:03 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Mar 4, 10:25 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 2:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 2:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Mar 4, 2:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 2:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Mar 4, 2:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 2:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Mike Galbraith, (Tue Mar 4, 3:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Jens Axboe, (Tue Mar 4, 3:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Mike Christie, (Sun Mar 2, 2:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Mar 2, 11:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling, James Bottomley, (Sat Mar 1, 11:19 am)