Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspending

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2008 - 5:36 am

* Klaus S. Madsen <ksm@hjernemadsen.org> wrote:


my guess would be that it's this commit that causes it:

| commit 6c3866558213ff706d8331053386915371ad63ec
| Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
| Date:   Wed Jan 30 13:32:55 2008 +0100
|
|    x86: move all asm/pgtable constants into one place


PAE activates NX on 32-bit. So we probably had an NX regression that got 
fixed by the side-effects of one of the unifications. Does it start 
working if you disable NX via the noexec=off boot option?

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspending, Klaus S. Madsen, (Wed Feb 27, 3:10 pm)
Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspe ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed Feb 27, 3:19 pm)
Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspe ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Feb 29, 6:18 pm)
Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspe ..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 4, 5:36 am)
Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspe ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Mar 4, 4:00 pm)
Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspe ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Mar 4, 4:21 pm)