login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for March 31 build fails with CONFIG_SLICOSS=y

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...>
Cc: <linux-next@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <netdev@...>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...>, Christopher Harrer <charrer@...>, Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...>
Date: Monday, March 31, 2008 - 11:55 am

On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 12:31:10AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Ah, missed that one, that's why it built on my machines (x86-64 and
i386), but would die on anything else.  That test is just wrong, I'll
fix it up to get it to build on all arches (doesn't mean it will run
though, it assumes that port io is memory mapped flat on all machines
and still needs a lot of work to be fixed.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for March 31, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon Mar 31, 3:11 am)
Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for March 31 build fail..., Greg KH, (Mon Mar 31, 11:55 am)
speck-geostationary