Hi all,
I have created today's linux-next tree at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git

(tar balls at

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/).
You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees

file in the source.  There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log files

in the Next directory.  Between each merge, the tree was built with

a ppc64_defconfig for powerpc and an allmodconfig for x86_64.
There were a few merge conflicts (fairly trivial).
People might like to check up in the (post-creation) build failures at

http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next, there are quite a few more than

usual.  I'll try to figure out what went wrong tomorrow unless you all

beat me to it.
We are up to 50 trees, more are welcome (even if they are currently

empty).  Thanks to those who have contributed, and to those who haven't,

please do.
In particular, I have very few of the architecture trees ....
Status of my local build tests is at

http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next.  If maintainers want to give

advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add

more builds.
Thanks to Jan Dittmer for adding the linux-next tree to his build tests

at http://l4x.org/k/ and the guys at http://test.kernel.org/.
--=20

Cheers,

Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

I see both avr32 builds currently fail, but for different

reasons...none of which is avr32-specific as far as I can tell.
defconfig fails with
drivers/ata/libata-core.c:127: error: 'ata_pci_default_filter' undeclared here (not in a function)
which seems to be due to CONFIG_ATA && !CONFIG_PCI
allnoconfig fails with
include/linux/netdevice.h:843: error: implicit declaration of function 'dev_net'
which seems to be because the definition of dev_net is inside #ifdef

CONFIG_NET, while next_net_device, which calls it, is not.
Haavard

--

Hi Haavard,
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:12:55 +0100 Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@a=
Thanks for tracking these down.
--=20

Cheers,

Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
I've checked in the following to net-2.6.26 to fix this, thanks:
commit 3edf8fa5ccf10688a9280b5cbca8ed3947c42866

Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Date:   Mon Mar 31 00:28:14 2008 -0700
    [NET]: Fix allnoconfig build on powerpc and avr32
    As reported by Haavard Skinnemoen and Stephen Rothwell:
    > allnoconfig fails with

    >

    > include/linux/netdevice.h:843: error: implicit declaration of function 'dev_net'

    >

    > which seems to be because the definition of dev_net is inside #ifdef

    > CONFIG_NET, while next_net_device, which calls it, is not.
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h

index 8576ca9..993758f 100644

--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h

+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h

@@ -827,6 +827,7 @@ struct packet_type {

 extern rwlock_t				dev_base_lock;		/* Device list lock */
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET

 #define for_each_netdev(net, d)		\

 		list_for_each_entry(d, &(net)->dev_base_head, dev_list)

 #define for_each_netdev_safe(net, d, n)	\

@@ -850,6 +851,7 @@ static inline struct net_device *first_net_device(struct net *net)

 	return list_empty(&net->dev_base_head) ? NULL :

 		net_device_entry(net->dev_base_head.next);

 }

+#endif
 extern int 			netdev_boot_setup_check(struct net_device *dev);

 extern unsigned long		netdev_boot_base(const char *prefix, int unit);

--