On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:14:55AM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote:Oh fantastic! That way, we could have drivers which eat 1Gig of RAM for almost nothing. Also, my experience with Java developers shows that what Java really is is a way to lower the entry level in the development world. That way, you can have completely incompetent people write complex applications without even thinking that it will run on a real machine. Most often, if it works in their IDE, they think it's OK to deploy (not mentioning the fact that RFC compliance is far from being a problem in these people's work). Of course, there are still real coders using this language, and they may do great things (when the frameworks permit). When you see salesmen announcing that their app will require about 400 GHz of CPU and half a TB of RAM to run, and noone even cares, you understand there's a big problem with the way things are written (the app that one was supposed to replace could run on 2 GHz of CPU and 4 GB of RAM in the C version). So please keep these technologies for sucking your nearby powerplant's power and justifying your boss that you need a monster machine which would make HPC people jealous, but I would hate it to make it easier for the people I described above to pollute the kernel with their crap. Willy --
| Ingo Molnar | [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Emmanuel Florac | RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6 |
| Con Kolivas | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: 2.6.24-rc3: find complains about /proc/net |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
