The conditions for the warnings simply ignored the fact that we later actually use the original value minus 1, so the warning triggered even for valid values. Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> ---OK, so I made a guess anyway, the new condition at least makes more sense to me. arch/x86/pci/irq.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/irq.c b/arch/x86/pci/irq.c index a871586..579745c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/pci/irq.c +++ b/arch/x86/pci/irq.c @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int pirq_ali_get(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq) { static const unsigned char irqmap[16] = { 0, 9, 3, 10, 4, 5, 7, 6, 1, 11, 0, 12, 0, 14, 0, 15 }; - WARN_ON_ONCE(pirq >= 16); + WARN_ON_ONCE(pirq > 16); return irqmap[read_config_nybble(router, 0x48, pirq-1)]; } @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static int pirq_ali_set(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq, i static const unsigned char irqmap[16] = { 0, 8, 0, 2, 4, 5, 7, 6, 0, 1, 3, 9, 11, 0, 13, 15 }; unsigned int val = irqmap[irq]; - WARN_ON_ONCE(pirq >= 16); + WARN_ON_ONCE(pirq > 16); if (val) { write_config_nybble(router, 0x48, pirq-1, val); return 1; @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static int pirq_via586_get(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq { static const unsigned int pirqmap[5] = { 3, 2, 5, 1, 1 }; - WARN_ON_ONCE(pirq >= 5); + WARN_ON_ONCE(pirq > 5); return read_config_nybble(router, 0x55, pirqmap[pirq-1]); } @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int pirq_via586_set(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq { static const unsigned int pirqmap[5] = { 3, 2, 5, 1, 1 }; - WARN_ON_ONCE(pirq >= 5); + WARN_ON_ONCE(pirq > 5); write_config_nybble(router, 0x55, pirqmap[pirq-1], irq); return 1; } @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static int pirq_ite_get(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq) { static const unsigned char pirqmap[4] = { 1, 0, 2, 3 }; - WARN_ON_ONCE(pirq >= 4); + WARN_ON_ONCE(pirq > 4); return read_config_nybble(router,0x43, pirqmap[pirq-1]); } @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static int pirq_ite_set(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq, i { static const unsigned char pirqmap[4] = { 1, 0, 2, 3 }; - WARN_ON_ONCE(pirq >= 4); + WARN_ON_ONCE(pirq > 4); write_config_nybble(router, 0x43, pirqmap[pirq-1], irq); return 1; } -- 1.5.5.rc2 --
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 011/196] sysfs: Fix a copy-n-paste typo in comment |
| Greg KH | Re: Linux 2.6.25.10 |
| Sam Ravnborg | Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages |
git: | |
| Peter Stahlir | Git as a filesystem |
| Ken Pratt | Re: pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Andy Parkins | svn:externals using git submodules |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [PATCH] Teach remote machinery about remotes.default config variable |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Mayuresh Kathe | Re: What is our ultimate goal?? |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| L. V. Lammert | Re: How to find all package files |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Mark Lord | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Vivek Dasmohapatra | 2.6.24 ipw2200 driver can't be reset after firmware explodes |
