Interesting read: http://research.sun.com/techrep/2006/smli_tr-2006-156.pdf Personal comments: Since KVM and Xen/OpenVZ etc other virtual machines are beginning to pop up - I don't see why it inhibits (in spite of the many initial difficulties as mentioned in the paper) the growth of using Java for device drivers development. Contrast it against udev - esp in terms of usability/supportability/extensibility etc. udev is a Linux thing, whereas Java is at industry level. If everyone write applications device drivers using Java (minus the extreme hardware arch specific stuff, but supports all the low level protocol specific stuff like TCP/IP, NFS, USB etc) then I think it has potential to compete against C lang - the monopolizer till today in the kernel world (Windows/MacOS/Linux/BSD etc). Ie, imagine using a drivers written for the Solaris in Linux, won't it be cool? --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Greg KH | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
