On 2008.03.30 15:22:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:Not freeing the input device at all would of course also hide any access-after-free problems :-) So if that's the case, that might explain the sudden exposure of the problem. IMHO, my patch is the right thing to do anyway, because releasing a grab on the underlying input device from within evdev clearly needs to happen before we release that device. So AFAICT we're really just looking for "why do we see that bug now?" and "is there another bug?" Sorry, forgot to set the In-Reply-To header when sending the patch. The original thread, with a reproducing recipe is here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/28/442 Message-Id: <1206742499.22530.90.camel@johannes.berg> Björn --
| Glauber de Oliveira Costa | [PATCH 5/25] [PATCH] native versions for system.h functions |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| Robert Hancock | Re: Disk spin down issue on shut down/suspend to disk |
git: | |
| David Kastrup | Empty directories... |
| Sean | Re: git and time |
| Martin Langhoff | Re: [PATCH 4/5] Overhaul of changeset application |
| Michael Witten | Re: Proposed git mv behavioral change |
| Bertram Scharpf | First install: Grub doesn't find partitions |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Tony Abernethy | Re: Important OpenBSD errata |
| Nuno Magalhães | Does CUPS depend on X?! [oB newbie] |
| hooanon05 | [PATCH 62/67] aufs magic sysrq handler |
| Avi Kivity | Re: [RFC] VM: I have a dream... |
| Alasdair G Kergon | Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature |
| Miklos Szeredi | [PATCH] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write |
