Re: sparc vs. gcc 4.3

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Miller <davem@...>
Cc: <bunk@...>, <wli@...>, <sparclinux@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, March 3, 2008 - 5:41 pm

On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 13:03 -0800, David Miller wrote:

Could you hide the asm inside an actual function and annotate the
function with __used?

Similar to how the kprobes has a function called kretprobe_trampoline_holder
for their trampoline asm?

arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c line 584

Cheers,

Harvey


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
sparc vs. gcc 4.3, Adrian Bunk, (Mon Mar 3, 3:26 pm)
Re: sparc vs. gcc 4.3, David Miller, (Mon Mar 3, 7:02 pm)
Re: sparc vs. gcc 4.3, David Miller, (Mon Mar 3, 5:03 pm)
Re: sparc vs. gcc 4.3, Harvey Harrison, (Mon Mar 3, 5:41 pm)
Re: sparc vs. gcc 4.3, David Miller, (Mon Mar 3, 6:02 pm)