>>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 03/27/08 9:41 AM >>>
quoted text
>
>* Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> wrote:
>
>> Please revert it for the time being, I've got a better version (i.e. 
>> without extra dead code being generated) that I intended to submit 
>> once I know whether the other issues pointed out in the description on 
>> the original patch also should be adjusted. Of course, that could also 
>> be done incrementally, but I would think overhauling the whole file at 
>> once wouldn't be a bad thing...
>
>since it appears to cause no problems in x86.git (it passed a lot of 
>testing already) i'd prefer to keep it (so that we can see any other 
>side-effects of touching this code) - could you send your improvements 
>as a delta against x86.git/latest? [or is there any outright bug caused 
>by your changes that necessiates a revert?]

That's fine with me (and no, there's no bug in there other than the
mentioned dead code generation).

Jan
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/