On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Christoph Lameter wrote:
quoted text
> 
> __GFP_ZERO is cleared in one place when new_slab() calls allocate_slab(). 

You're so full of crap that it's not even funny.

The fact that one path does it correct makes it ok to do it wrong in 
another path?

quoted text
> The fallback code in 2.6.25 will go away in 2.6.26.

And the fact that 2.5.26 may fix it differently makes it ok to be buggy in 
2.6.25?

You are not making any sense what-so-ever.

		Linus
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/