>> > NACK-ed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>Frankly, the "problem" has not yet been established. Ingo has failed to respond to Mathieu's analysis of the actual instruction streams, which cast doubt on Ingo's technique of simply counting bytes. So far, neither Ingo nor Mathieu have published *time measurements* to quantify the actual (as opposed to speculated) costs. It's a problem, and there are a few improvements under way or being contemplated: - compression of the DWARF data to eliminate more duplication - support for inserting probes only on function entry/exit points without debugging data - relying on symbol tables and raw ABI - a networked service to allow one machine to serve site-wide systemtap needs At the end of the day, lots of information will still need to be around for those who need to put probes approximately anywhere and to pull approximately any data out. It may seem counterintuitive to you, but remember that object code is recreated from scratch new every build, yet source code only gradually (?) changes. Try checking in 3 years' builds of stripped object files into a git repo. - FChE --
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| H. Peter Anvin | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
| Nicolas Pitre | Re: [RFC patch 08/18] cnt32_to_63 should use smp_rmb() |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
