On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> wrote:
quoted text > Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> It means you shouldn't use dd as a benchmark.
> >
> > If you want to benchmark write speed, you should add
> > oflag=direct,dsync to the dd command line. For benchmarking read speed
> > you should specify iflag=direct. Or, even better, you can use xdd with
> > the flags -dio -processlock.
>
> No, you want your benchmark to measure performance doing what the
> application does. Do unless you have an application which has been
> heavily Linux-ized you don't want to measure something unrelated to the
> application requirements.
A basic fact I learned in science classes: if you measure something,
know very well what you measure and make sure your measurement is
repeatable. But it was some time ago I learned this. Maybe the whole
world changed since I learned that ?
Bart.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6 , Bart Van Assche , (Fri Mar 28, 3:44 am)