On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:06:25PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Works for me...
struct flag_name would be better; will do on merge.
BTW, do we really want to bother with quoting? Anyway, that can live
for now...
You know, _if_ we want to go that way, let's do it right; all callers
of ->show() are in seq_file.c and all of them know the previous value
of m->count. So let's define SEQ_SKIP as 1 and teach these 3 callers
to handle it. And make this sucker (and anything else that might want
the same kind of things) return SEQ_SKIP instead of playing with m->count
directly.
Again, will do on merge...
--