Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <jamagallon@...>
Cc: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@...>, Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:49 pm

J.A. Magallón wrote:


Ah, agreement from another direction. Yes, portable solutions often use 
tools like awk, grep, and sed, which do just the very thing which make 
2.6 unhappy. And to claim that this is a vm problem (hopefully not) and 
that Linux is no longer good at complex tasks like copying a large file 
a line at a time, at leat unless you have GBs of memory so it can 
"scale," I really hope that's very wrong.


Major company seen in the news which has custom QA hardware which writes 
one very long line of ASCII every 100ms for 17hrs, and now they have to 
read it with awk or perl and write info to multiple data files.

I just copied an 8GB DVD image from one drive to another. I checked, it 
doesn't go through a dial-up modem, it's just painfully *slow*.

I think the problem is that many developers *do* use big machines, with 
fast disk, lots of memory, and don't spend much time using (or making 
useful) more typical desktop configurations. And yes, these are "real" 
applications, and they run better on 2.4.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Emmanuel Florac, (Tue Mar 25, 2:43 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bart Van Assche, (Wed Mar 26, 4:42 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Emmanuel Florac, (Wed Mar 26, 7:07 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bart Van Assche, (Wed Mar 26, 7:15 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Emmanuel Florac, (Wed Mar 26, 8:36 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Thu Mar 27, 6:03 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bart Van Assche, (Wed Mar 26, 9:22 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Tue Mar 25, 6:37 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Chris Snook, (Tue Mar 25, 6:00 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bart Van Assche, (Wed Mar 26, 3:15 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Thu Mar 27, 5:53 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bart Van Assche, (Fri Mar 28, 3:44 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Fri Mar 28, 8:04 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Emmanuel Florac, (Wed Mar 26, 3:56 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Tue Mar 25, 6:47 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Chris Snook, (Tue Mar 25, 7:13 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Pádraig Brady, (Wed Jul 16, 10:52 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Chris Snook, (Wed Jul 16, 2:18 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Tue Mar 25, 7:42 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Chris Snook, (Wed Mar 26, 12:39 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Emmanuel Florac, (Wed Mar 26, 4:05 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Chris Snook, (Wed Mar 26, 12:51 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, "J.A. Magallón", (Wed Mar 26, 4:25 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Thu Mar 27, 5:49 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Emmanuel Florac, (Tue Mar 25, 6:09 pm)