processor flags

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 3:47 pm

Hi Peter, Ingo

could you spend a few minutes on me? ;)

You know, I'm almost complete changing the vm86 flags
with X86_EFLAGS_... but there is a hidden problem lays.
Look, in vm86.h we have the definition

#ifdef CONFIG_VM86
#define VM_MASK		0x00020000
#else
#define VM_MASK		0 /* ignored */
#endif

which has an indirect conditional compilation effect.
For example, if we take a look on include/asm-x86/ptrace.h

	static inline int v8086_mode(struct pt_regs *regs)
	{
	#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
		return (regs->flags & VM_MASK);
	#else
		return 0;	/* No V86 mode support in long mode */
	#endif
	}

so if we don't have CONFIG_VM86 defined this function *always*
returning 0 so there I can't just change VM_MASK to X86_EFLAGS_VM.

Another piece of code from traps_32.c:do_general_protection

	if (regs->flags & VM_MASK)
		goto gp_in_vm86;

so if we didn't set CONFIG_VM86 i think this part is just thrown out
by gcc. So as we see, this VM_MASK original flag is not *just* a flag
but also says gcc which part of code to compile.

And now I'm in confusion - the way of changing this code I see is the
following:

- or use additional #ifdef CONFIG_VM86 in code where VM_MASK is used
  (that would be ugly IMHO)
- rename VM_MASK to say X86_EFLAGS_VM86 with that #ifdef remained
- rest VM_MASK as it is

How do you think?

		- Cyrill -
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
processor flags, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Thu Mar 27, 3:47 pm)
Re: processor flags, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Mar 27, 3:55 pm)
Re: processor flags, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Thu Mar 27, 3:56 pm)