On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 06:22:01PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
quoted text
> > +/*
> > + * crc-ccitt with MSB first (i.e., backwards), so we can't use the
> > + * kernel table as-is.
> > + */
> 
> Why not just add a be-bitwise table, similar to the crc32_le and
> crc32_be implementation.

Yeah, that is probably a better idea.  I didn't do it before since
this lived outside the tree and I didn't want to patch the kernel.

Will that add 1k for everyone?

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com 

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/