login
Header Space

 
 

Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...>, <linux-next@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Jan Dittmer <jdi@...>
Date: Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 8:11 am

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:54:59 +0200
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:


We do have some gcc 3.x patches lying around somewhere, but I don't
think that's something we want to inflict on others ;-)

The first toolchain we ever released to the outside was based on gcc
4.0.2, so it is "ancient" in the sense that it has lots of
avr32-specific bugs that later toolchains don't have. I agree that we
should still try to support it as long as possible.


Still stuck in legal hell, I think.

Haavard
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for March 27, Stephen Rothwell, (Thu Mar 27, 3:33 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Greg KH, (Thu Mar 27, 10:45 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Stephen Rothwell, (Fri Mar 28, 12:53 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Greg KH, (Fri Mar 28, 4:27 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Stephen Rothwell, (Fri Mar 28, 11:56 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Haavard Skinnemoen, (Thu Mar 27, 5:42 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Stephen Rothwell, (Thu Mar 27, 6:29 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Mar 27, 6:47 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Haavard Skinnemoen, (Thu Mar 27, 7:32 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Mar 27, 7:54 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Jan Dittmer, (Thu Mar 27, 8:54 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Haavard Skinnemoen, (Thu Mar 27, 9:31 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Mar 27, 9:22 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27, Haavard Skinnemoen, (Thu Mar 27, 8:11 am)
[BUILD_FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for March 27, Kamalesh Babulal, (Thu Mar 27, 4:49 am)
speck-geostationary