On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:47:45 +0200 Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:Hmm...that must be a pretty ancient toolchain. In any case, the patch below should fix it. The commit being reverted is not in mainline, so I'll probably just drop both of them next time I rebase. FWIW, a more recent toolchain is available here: http://avr32linux.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/BinutilsPatches http://avr32linux.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GccPatches Haavard From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:23:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Revert "avr32: Use better asm constraint in prefetch()" This reverts commit e153fa1406b68460e0a8e498a2b83d50584cc40a. This commit caused build breakage with some old 4.0.2-based gcc. Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com> --- include/asm-avr32/processor.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/asm-avr32/processor.h b/include/asm-avr32/processor.h index 2abd3de..49a88f5 100644 --- a/include/asm-avr32/processor.h +++ b/include/asm-avr32/processor.h @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ extern void show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long sp, static inline void prefetch(const void *x) { const char *c = x; - asm volatile("pref %0" : : "RKs16"(*c)); + asm volatile("pref %0" : : "r"(c)); } #define PREFETCH_STRIDE L1_CACHE_BYTES -- 1.5.4.3 --
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| James Bottomley | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Andrew Morton | echo mem > /sys/power/state |
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| Michael S. Tsirkin | Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/19] vbus: add connection-client helper infrastructure |
| NeilBrown | [PATCH 00/18] Assorted md patches headed for 2.6.30 |
| Justin Piszcz | General question (scheduler) with SSDs? |
| Neil Brown | Re: Any hope for a 27 disk RAID6+1HS array with four disks reporting "No md superb... |
| Ryan Wagoner | High IO Wait with RAID 1 |
