Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in net_rx_action

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <a.p.zijlstra@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>, <jarkao2@...>, <netdev@...>, <bugme-daemon@...>, <marcus@...>, <shemminger@...>, <rjw@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <mingo@...>
Date: Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 7:03 am

From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:56:19 +0100


Yep, that will deadlock.

Can some test if using local_irq_{save,restore}() in
napi_complete() cures this lockdep warning?

Thanks.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Mar 27, 5:56 pm)
Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in ..., David Miller, (Thu Mar 27, 7:03 am)