From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:56:17 -0700 (PDT)Actually, ever since gcc went to a garbage collecting allocator, I've found it to be a TLB thrasher. It will repeatedly randomly walk over a GC pool of at least 8MB in size, which to fit fully in the TLB with 4K pages reaquires a TLB with 2048 entries assuming gcc touches no other data which is of course a false assumption. For some compiles this GC pool is more than 100MB in size. GCC does not fit into any modern TLB using it's base page size. --
| James Bottomley | Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree |
| James Bottomley | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| H. Peter Anvin | First cut at git port to Cygwin |
| Matthieu Moy | [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index |
| Eric Hanchrow | Re: how to backup git |
| Aaron Bentley | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Steve Davis | Re: Linux on Macintrashes? (Was: Re: Linux on |
| Vincent Poy | Linux |
| Michael K. Johnson | patches |
| Voravit Euavatanakorn | Linux |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Richard Stallman | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Juan Miscaro | When will OpenBSD support UTF8? |
| Rico Secada | About non-free software in OpenBSD |
