On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Paul Mackerras wrote:
quoted text > So the improvement in the user time is almost all due to the reduced
> TLB misses (as one would expect). For the system time, using 64k
> pages in the VM reduces it by about 21%, and using 64k hardware pages
> reduces it by another 30%. So the reduction in kernel overhead is
> significant but not as large as the impact of reducing TLB misses.
One should emphasize that this test was a kernel compile which is not
a load that gains much from larger pages. 4k pages are mostly okay for
loads that use large amounts of small files.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: larger default page sizes... , Christoph Lameter , (Wed Mar 26, 10:56 am)