On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:03:36AM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:05:17PM -0500, Dean Nelson wrote:
> 
> Gah, who ever came up with that syntax.  Yep, thats a falsie.  Should be
> fixed in the latest version:
> 
>   http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/apw/checkpatch/checkpatch.pl-next
> 
> Thanks for the report.

You're welcome and thanks for the quick fix to checkpatch.pl.
I used the new version and it fixed the problem except for ones that were of
the following form:

enum xp_retval (*xp_set_amo_with_interrupt) (u64 *amo_va, int op, u64 operand,
                                             int remote, int nasid,
                                             int phys_cpuid, int vector);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xp_set_amo_with_interrupt);

which still generated the false positive:

WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); should immediately follow its function/variable
#70: FILE: misc/xp/xp_main.c:70:
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xp_set_amo_with_interrupt);

Thanks,
Dean
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/