On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:

quoted text
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 09:16 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > well, since i already have the output from my script, i might toss
> > together some per-directory patches to start removing some of
> > that. this sounds more like a one-shot thing than adding permanent
> > checking to the build process.
>
> Makes sense.
>
> Remember, one of our goals is to move towards having files which are
> just _copied_ (header-y) instead of having these ifdefs. If, in your
> travels, you see a way you can split headers up more sensibly to
> achieve that, it would be good.

that might be harder to encode into a script.  :-)

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/