login
Header Space

 
 

Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 - 9:22 am

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com> wrote:

It's good to see that the synchronous write throughput is identical
for the 2.4.32 and 2.6.22.18 kernels.

Regarding NFS: there are many parameters that influence NFS
performance. Are you using the userspace NFS daemon or the NFS daemon
in the kernel ? Telling NFS that it should use TCP instead of UDP
usually increases performance, as well as increasing the read and
write block size. And if there is only a single client accessing the
NFS filesystem, you can increase the attribute cache timeout in order
to decrease the number of NFS getattr calls. You could e.g. try the
following command on the client:

mount -o remount,actimeo=86400,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,nfsvers=3,tcp,nolock
/mnt/temp

Please read the nfs(5) man page before using these parameters in a
production environment. Note: the output of the nfsstat command can be
helpful when optimizing NFS performance.

Bart.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Emmanuel Florac, (Tue Mar 25, 2:43 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bart Van Assche, (Wed Mar 26, 4:42 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Emmanuel Florac, (Wed Mar 26, 7:07 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bart Van Assche, (Wed Mar 26, 7:15 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Emmanuel Florac, (Wed Mar 26, 8:36 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Thu Mar 27, 6:03 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bart Van Assche, (Wed Mar 26, 9:22 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Tue Mar 25, 6:37 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Chris Snook, (Tue Mar 25, 6:00 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bart Van Assche, (Wed Mar 26, 3:15 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Thu Mar 27, 5:53 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bart Van Assche, (Fri Mar 28, 3:44 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Fri Mar 28, 8:04 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Emmanuel Florac, (Wed Mar 26, 3:56 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Tue Mar 25, 6:47 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Chris Snook, (Tue Mar 25, 7:13 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Pádraig Brady, (Wed Jul 16, 10:52 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Chris Snook, (Wed Jul 16, 2:18 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Tue Mar 25, 7:42 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Chris Snook, (Wed Mar 26, 12:39 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Emmanuel Florac, (Wed Mar 26, 4:05 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Chris Snook, (Wed Mar 26, 12:51 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, "J.A. Magallón", (Wed Mar 26, 4:25 am)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Bill Davidsen, (Thu Mar 27, 5:49 pm)
Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6, Emmanuel Florac, (Tue Mar 25, 6:09 pm)
speck-geostationary