Re: sparc64 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mariusz Kozlowski
Date: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 - 4:46 am

Hello,


Ok it worked. Now I get a bunch of these:

BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: pidof/2471
caller is flush_ptrace_access+0xc0/0x1a0
Call Trace:
 [000000000042ef78] flush_ptrace_access+0xc0/0x1a0
 [00000000004ae6e4] access_process_vm+0x1ac/0x220
 [0000000000508e38] proc_pid_cmdline+0x60/0x120
 [000000000050acb8] proc_info_read+0x80/0xe0
 [00000000004c6fcc] vfs_read+0x74/0x120
 [00000000004c73cc] sys_read+0x34/0x60
 [0000000000406314] linux_sparc_syscall32+0x3c/0x40
 [00000000f7df5fe4] 0xf7df5fec

	Mariusz
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Linux 2.6.25-rc7, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Mar 25, 7:07 pm)
sparc64 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible, Mariusz Kozlowski, (Wed Mar 26, 3:42 am)
Re: sparc64 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible, Mariusz Kozlowski, (Wed Mar 26, 4:46 am)
Re: sparc64 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible, Mariusz Kozlowski, (Wed Mar 26, 5:10 am)
Re: sparc64 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible, Andrew Morton, (Wed Mar 26, 8:25 pm)
Re: sparc64 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible, David Miller, (Wed Mar 26, 11:33 pm)